ANALISIS MOTIVASI KERJA, KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL DAN BUDAYA ORGANISASI TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN DIMEDIASI KEPUASAN KERJA PADA ANGKATAN KERJA GENERASI Z

Gilang Pratama,, Elistia Elistia

Abstract


Research on the Z generation workforce is important to do related that this workforce has just entered the world of work, which is recorded as having reached a total proportion of 40% in various industrial sectors available in the labor market. By understanding earlier about the factors that can affect employee performance, management can carry out human resource planning and design to ensure improved performance. Departing from changes in today's competitive organizational management and the very few empirical studies on the Z generation workforce, the main object of this research is to help stakeholders increase their organization's competitive advantage from the aspect of human resource management. In this study, the population used is the labor force classified as generation Z (year of birth; 1997-2007) in Indonesia. The sample method used in this study is Non-Probability Sampling, with a sample size of 475 respondents. The data analysis technique used in this research is the Structural Equation Modeling technique with the Partial Least Squares method. Based on the results of testing and discussion, it is concluded that Organizational Culture has the greatest positive influence on Generation Z Employee Performance, Leadership with a Transformational Style and Work Motivation has a positive influence on Generation Z Employee Performance and subsequently Job Satisfaction is proven to mediate the three exogenous variables on Employee Performance.

 

Keywords: Generation Z, Motivation, Leadership, Satisfaction, Performance.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amburgey, W. (2005). An analysis of the relationship between job satisfaction, organizational culture, and perceived leadership characteristics. University of Central Florida. Florida: Proquest Digital Dissertation

Armstrong M (2006). Human Resource Management Practice, Kogan Page, Pp. 251-269.

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2005). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). England: Psychology Press.

DuBrin, A. J. (2012). Leadership (Terjemahan ed.). Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Elenkov, D. (2002). Effects of Leadership on Motivation and Performance in Russian Companies. Journal of Business Research, 55, 467-480.

Gibson, J. L. (2006). Organizations (Behavior, Structure, Processes) (12 ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

Hair, J. F., Hult, J. T., & Ringle, C. M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). New York: Pearson.

Hasibuan, M. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Revisi ed.). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kotter, J. (2012). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: Free Press.

Malhotra, N. (2019). Marketing Research An Applied Orientation (7 ed.). New York: Pearson.

Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Robbins. (2018). Organizational Behavior: Concept, Controversies, Applications. Canada: Pearson.

Sadasa, K. (2013). The Influence of organizational culture, leadership, job satisfaction towards teacher job performance. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 4(9), 1637-1642

Smith, Kendall, & Hulin. (2004). Prilaku Organisasi (7 ed.). (Munandar, Trans.) Jakarta: Erlangga.

Zaman, K., & Yiing, L. H. (2009). The moderating effects of organizational culture on the relationships between leadership behaviour and organizational commitment and between organizational commitment and job satisfaction and performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(1), 53-86.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.